China Day 2: Shanghai
Our morning began with a class session from 9am-noon. It
seems a bit odd to travel halfway around the world and then spend time in an
interior hotel conference room listening to lecture, but it seems that most
sessions will be fairly interactive with guest speakers, etc. Today’s lecture
focused more on 20th Century Chinese history (Mao and Deng
Xiaoping), and the range from economic disasters (the Great Famine in 1961-1963
which created the most deaths of any known famine in history) to skyrocketing
growth in more recent years.
After the morning session, we divided into groups to visit
local businesses. Some groups visited
IBM, Glaxo Smith Kline, and others – I joined the GM group. China holds strict
rules about foreign investments, essentially requiring that any foreign company
partner with a Chinese company in order to do business in China. GM here is
therefore Shanghai GM (“SGM”), a 50/50 joint venture between GM and the
Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp. We meandered through the SGM showroom, where
the primary brands are Buick, Cadillac, and Chevrolet. Some models not produced
in China were considerably more expensive than in the US – for example, the
Escalade, which is about $85k in the US was listed at ¥1.58 M RMB, roughly $250,000
USD. Other models produced in China are more consistently, if not less
expensively priced.
One of the head executives spoke about SGM’s experience in
China, and we spent about an hour walking through the plant itself. The plant
looks similar to what I imagine a US plant to be – large lines of cars, with a
variety of workers repeating similar tasks to the cars along the assembly line.
Some process appeared more manual (workers hand-sorted stacks of auto parts to
deliver to assembly line workers), other parts impressively automated (robots
drove several rolling carts of supplies around the plant themselves).
The SGM executive also spent several years before Shanghai
establishing a plant in India, and mentioned that the difference in worker
mentality had been a significant between the two places. His experience in
India was that the worker mentality was much more individual, with workers
becoming intensely competitive against their colleagues, sometimes to the detriment
of the firm’s goals. In China, he explained, the stronger group mentality helps
the firm move with more focus towards a goal once a decision is made. The
infrastructure approach between the two countries is also quite different. The
strong power of the Chinese government in business was actually a positive many
ways from the exec’s perspective; if your firm’s goal (such as building a new
plant) aligns with the government’s economic goals (i.e. expanding the Chinese
economy), then the ‘strong hand’ of the government makes sure that
infrastructure and other barriers are quickly overcome. Of course, if your
purpose runs counter to what is in the government’s best interest, beware.
An interesting point brought up in our lectures this morning
is that the majority of politicians in the US and other western countries tend
to have first been lawyers. In China, most tend to have been engineers. This
can be a good thing, in that the Chinese government is very willing to try new
things to test what works best and adopt it, but also a weak point as they tend
to approach laws/regulations as pieces of paper that can be worked around.
This is particularly evident in the IP world. IP is one of
SGM’s most complex issues, because any R&D done in China belongs to SGM,
not solely to GM, and SAIC has joint ventures with many other car companies,
including GM competitors like Volkswagon. GM therefore has to firewall IP
between what is developed in the US (belonging to GM only) and what is
developed in China (and jointly owned by GM/SAIC).
I left the hotel around 8pm for dinner with EMBA friends at
Shanghai Citizen, a popular ex-pat restaurant (left), then drinks on the
rooftop Bar Rouge (right) on the Bund, a popular section of the city featuring
old architecture and swanky hotels.
There seems to be an odd mix of censorship here – I can
access gmail, but not blogspot; cnn, but not the Wall Street Journal. Then
again, when I clicked on the Asia section of the cnn webpage, I could see a
headline about the latest news on the Chinese human rights activist, but the
article link itself returned a “page could not be found” error.
No comments:
Post a Comment